Are unit root tests useful in the debate over the (non)stationarity of hours worked? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Macroeconomic Dynamics Year : 2015

Are unit root tests useful in the debate over the (non)stationarity of hours worked?

(1) , (2) , (3, 4)
1
2
3
4

Abstract

The performance of unit root tests on simulated series is compared, using the business-cycle model of Chang et al. (2007) to generate data. Overall, Monte Carlo simulations show that the e¢ cient unit root tests of Ng and Perron (2001) are more powerful than the standard unit root tests. These e¢ cient tests are frequnetly able (i) to reject the unit-root hypothesis on simulated series, using the best speci…-cation of the business-cycle model found by Chang et al. (2007), in which hours worked are stationary with adjustment costs, and (ii) to reduce the gap between the theoretical impulse response functions and those estimated with a Structural VAR model. The results of Monte Carlo simulations show that the hump-shaped behaviour of data can explain the divergence between unit root tests.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
MD_Charles.pdf (467.89 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01101618 , version 1 (09-01-2015)

Identifiers

Cite

Amélie Charles, Olivier Darné, Fabien Tripier. Are unit root tests useful in the debate over the (non)stationarity of hours worked?. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 2015, 19, pp.167 - 188. ⟨10.1017/S1365100513000321⟩. ⟨hal-01101618⟩
143 View
376 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More