The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: A discriminant analysis - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles Economics Bulletin Year : 2015

The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: A discriminant analysis

(1) , (1) , (1)
1
Etienne Redor
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 933274
Constantin Zopounidis
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 954161

Abstract

This article contributes to the literature by examining the determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards. As critical mass theory suggests, the mere presence of women on boards may not be sufficient to bring significant change to the boardroom and to improve corporate governance. While studying the determinants of female presence on boards is useful, it may be helpful to study what are the characteristics of firms that have a sufficient number of women to enhance governance. In this paper, we study the predictors of the existence of a critical mass of women on S&P 100 boards between 1995 and 2010. We show that firms with at least three female directors have larger boards, are larger, are more likely to be run by a female CEO and have a greater proportion of non-Caucasian directors. On the contrary, we were not able to show significant differences in firm performance and board independence between firms with and without a critical mass of women on their boards.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
EB-15-V35-I3-P185.pdf (150.54 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01188269 , version 1 (28-08-2015)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01188269 , version 1

Cite

Amélie Charles, Etienne Redor, Constantin Zopounidis. The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: A discriminant analysis. Economics Bulletin, 2015, 35 (3), pp.185-197. ⟨hal-01188269⟩
391 View
834 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More