Stakes, positions and logics: An institutional field analysis of cross-border health IT policy - Audencia Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Journal of Information Technology Année : 2022

Stakes, positions and logics: An institutional field analysis of cross-border health IT policy

Wendy Currie

Résumé

The concepts field and habitus are used widely and variably in institutional theory. The intellectual antecedents are found in the work of the French Sociologist, Pierre Bourdieu. This study presents a field-level analysis of pan-European policy on cross-border health information technology. Using field theory and institutional theory, we situate field as a multi-level concept which extends institutional and organizational levels of analysis. Empirical data is gathered from European policymakers, health professionals and patient advocacy groups on the diffusion of supra-national health information technology across European Member States. Findings reveal four scenarios depicting field tensions, as ideological and practical imperatives of supra-national health information technology policy mis-align with Member State health systems. This study has implications for policy-makers and other stakeholders, who seek to narrow the digital divide across health fields and sub-fields.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Stakes Positions and Logics.pdf (433.41 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-03684888 , version 1 (05-06-2022)

Identifiants

Citer

Wendy Currie, Jonathan Jm Seddon. Stakes, positions and logics: An institutional field analysis of cross-border health IT policy. Journal of Information Technology, 2022, 37 (2), pp.165-187. ⟨10.1177/02683962211040513⟩. ⟨hal-03684888⟩

Collections

AUDENCIA UNAM
34 Consultations
120 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More